News

• Home
• Media Centre
• Why Transmission Velocity, Not Engagement Scores, Predicts Enterprise Performance in the GCC

Why Transmission Velocity, Not Engagement Scores, Predicts Enterprise Performance in the GCC

03 April, 2026

Middle East CEOs are no longer debating whether to transform. The question in 2026 is whether their organisations can transform fast enough, and safely enough, to keep up with national visions, new regulation and shifting global demand. [PwC 29th Global Survey, GCC findings]. Across the GCC, leaders talk about strategy, digital, M&A and diversification. But when plans stall, the root cause is usually not the idea. It is the system that is supposed to move the idea through the organisation.

 

Recent CEO surveys underline the same concern, leaders are worried about the speed and effectiveness of their transformation, not about the lack of ambition [PwC 2026 Global Survey]. In that context, one question matters more than it did even a few years ago: how quickly, clearly and cleanly do decisions travel from your boardroom to your frontline?

 

Most companies still reach first for engagement scores to explain why execution feels slow. Are people motivated? Are they happy? These questions matter. But if you want to predict whether an organisation will actually deliver on its transformation agenda, a better metric is what I call Transmission Velocity.

 

What Transmission Velocity is – and why it matters now

 

Transmission Velocity is the rate at which a strategic decision moves through the organisation with clarity, ownership and pace, without losing its intent in translation – and how reliably that movement converts into results.

 

This is not about moving faster at any cost. It is about whether your system is designed to move at the speed your strategy requires. In practice, Transmission Velocity depends on four design choices:

 

Clear decision rights – who decides, who advises and who executes between the Board, Group, Business Units and local markets.

 

Coherent execution – whether capital, people and technology land where they are needed, when they are needed, to deliver the strategy.

 

Low signal loss – whether a strategic priority means the same thing in a Dubai HQ as it does in a office in Riyadh or a site in Cairo.

 

Calibrated governance – whether fast, reversible decisions move quickly, while high-stakes decisions follow a deliberate path.

 

When these four elements are strong, the organisation behaves like one enterprise instead of a collection of silos. In a year when CEOs are under pressure to show tangible progress on transformation, that difference is what turns PowerPoint into performance [PwC 2026 Global Survey].

 

Why engagement scores can mislead GCC leaders

 

Engagement surveys are now a fixture in GCC board packs. High scores are often read as a sign of health, and low scores trigger a wave of people initiatives. Yet in many organisations, those numbers can say more about comfort than about capability to execute.

 

In stable or low-complexity operations, employees may feel positive while the business quietly under-delivers. For high performers inside ambitious regional groups, frustration rarely comes from hard work. It comes from ambiguity, bureaucracy and the inability to move things forward.

 

In other words, disengagement is frequently structural before it is emotional. When decision rights are unclear, approvals stack up and accountability blurs, even highly motivated teams slow down. People do not leave because they are tired, they leave because they are stuck.

 

Transmission Velocity flips the starting point. Instead of asking “Are they engaged?”, leaders ask “Where is the bottleneck?” If capable teams are moving slowly, the answer usually lies in how decisions, priorities and resources flow through the system, not in the sentiment data.

 

How to know if you have a transmission problem

 

The commercial case for getting this right is strong. Research from Bain & Company across nearly 800 firms found that decision effectiveness correlates with financial results at a 95 per cent confidence level, and that top-quintile companies on decision effectiveness deliver shareholder returns nearly six percentage points higher than their peers [Bain & Company, Decision Insights: Score your organization]. In a GCC environment deploying significant capital into projects and transformational initiatives, that gap compounds quickly.

 

Diagnosing low Transmission Velocity does not require a major consulting exercise. It requires honest answers to a few simple questions about how decisions actually move today:

 

Decision cycle time: How long does it take between approving a major initiative – a new market entry, a product launch, a post-merger integration and…  the first revenue, customer impact or cost saving?

 

Escalation frequency: How often are decisions pushed back up to Group because ownership between functions or business units is unclear?

 

Rework rate: How many projects are restarted because the brief changed between the board, executive committee and delivery teams?

 

Intent fidelity: If you asked a frontline manager to describe the current strategic priority, would it match the Board’s language?

 

Approval depth: How many signatures does it take to fill a critical vacancy, sign off a pilot or change in policy?

 

In many GCC organisations, these questions expose the same pattern: duplication, ambiguity and friction baked into legacy structures and relationships. The strategy is not the issue. The transmission system is.

 

The People Engine behind Transmission Velocity

 

Fixing Transmission Velocity is not a “nice to have” HR initiative. It is core enterprise design. It requires what I call a People Engine – the way leadership, organisation and governance work together to move strategy through the system.

 

Three elements matter most:

 

Leadership clarity

 

Sovereign investors, Boards and executives must be explicit about the few priorities that truly matter and about who owns what. Where that clarity is weak, decisions stall, priorities conflict and local markets improvise their own agendas.

 

Organisation design

 

Structure must follow strategy, not legacy. Reporting lines, spans of control and the split between Group and Business Units should be designed around the decisions that drive value, not historical compromises. When structure is misaligned, even clear decisions take far longer to execute than they should.

 

Governance that accelerates, not constrains

 

Governance is essential in a regulated, high-stakes region. The issue is not having it, it is having the wrong kind. Fast-path decisions, operational, reversible, low-risk, should move quickly at the level closest to the work. Slow-path decisions, capital allocation, market entry, structural change, should follow a clear, disciplined process with defined owners. The role of the Board is to set the guardrails, the role of management is to design within them.

 

These are often treated as background conditions. In reality, they are the mechanism through organisations strategies either compound or dissipate.

 

A new lens for Middle East CEOs in 2026

 

As 2026 unfolds, Middle East CEOs are being judged less on the ambition of their vision and more on the evidence of execution [PwC 2026 Global Survey, GCC findings].

 

Investors, regulators and employees are all asking the same question: can this organisation actually adapt at the speed the environment now demands?

 

Transmission Velocity offers a clearer answer than engagement scores alone. It links people and performance without collapsing into scorekeeping. It forces boards and CEOs to ask not only “What is our strategy?” but “How far, how fast and how cleanly does that strategy travel through our system?”

 

In a GCC context – where ambitions are high, capital is plenty and the pace of change is relentless, that question will increasingly separate the winners from the rest. Engagement scores will still have their place. But if you want to know which organisations will deliver on their transformation promises over the next decade, watch their Transmission Velocity.

Source:businesstoday.me